Streaming giant Netflix will invest $905 million to transform a vacant Army base in New Jersey into its East Coast production hub. Other late-night hosts are ‘sad sack’ climate-change hypocrites: Greg Gutfeldĭaniel Radcliffe, girlfriend bring newborn baby to NYC SAG-AFTRA picket line in rare sighting The success of ‘Barbenheimer’ means nothing for the movies
#New jersey drive netflix update#
(Kamiya also challenged the results of the Shift Project’s newer report in a November 2020 update to his IEA article.Vaccine expert slammed for predicting ‘Barbenheimer’ will spark COVID surge The Shift Project responded to Kamiya’s fact-check with this document in June 2020, stating that Kamiya was correct about the Netflix claim being wrong, and that some of the data in one of its earlier reports had been flawed. Kamiya described streaming as "a fairly low-emitting activity." If you do a little more math, you’ll find that the estimated emissions of a 4-mile drive is around the same as 45 hours of video streaming in the U.S. That means 4 miles of driving emits about 1,616 grams of CO2, which is about 90 times Kamiya’s estimate of the emissions of a 30-minute Netflix show. He wrote that streaming a 30-minute show on Netflix in 2019 released around 18 grams of emissions.Īccording to a report published by the Environmental Protection Agency in March 2018, the average American passenger car emits 404 grams of carbon dioxide per mile.
That said, Kamiya came up with an estimate based on averages in 2019. Driving at different speeds or using energy from different countries can influence these numbers, too. Even the year makes a difference, because energy efficiency for data transfer is growing rapidly, as is the efficiency of cars and the availability of electric cars. As Kamiya wrote, watching on different devices and driving different cars affects the comparison.
In response, the International Energy Agency published a fact-check in February 2020 by digital/energy analyst George Kamiya.įinding the exact comparison between driving and Netflix is difficult, as all kinds of data fluctuate. The claim warped to include Netflix as it gained media traction. That's equivalent to driving 3.9 miles (6.28 kilometers)." "Watching a half-hour show would lead to emissions of 1.6 kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalent, said Maxime Efoui-Hess of French think tank the Shift Project. The article, which is about the carbon impact of streaming services, no longer contains any comparison between driving and Netflix.Īccording to its website, the specific claim about the half-hour of viewing came from an oral interview, quotes from which were published in AFP, a French cooperative news agency. The correction says the article originally "relied on data produced by the The Shift Project," which is a French think tank advocating a shift to a post-carbon economy. The article now includes a correction dated Jan. Often, a screenshot of the original tweet is shown with a response from the Twitter account tweet was originally meant to promote this article on, but the tweet has been deleted. We found the claim on Facebook, Twitter and meme pages.
But the comparison presented doesn’t add up. We wondered whether the comparison between driving a specific distance and watching Netflix for a specific amount of time checks out.īroadly speaking, watching streaming services does impact climate change through energy use, data transfer, and the production of devices such as TVs and computers. (Read more about our partnership with Facebook.) The tweet from crossed over to Facebook, where it was flagged as part of Facebook’s efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. The emissions generated by watching 30 minutes of Netflix is the same as driving almost 4 miles." Don’t touch that dial - or rather, don’t exit that tab of Netflix - if you’re worried that streaming services are as bad for the environment as a short drive.Ī popular screenshot of a tweet claims, "Your Netflix binge-watching is making climate change worse, say experts.
0 kommentar(er)
